Looking for:
- Acdsee pro 10 vs lightroom free |
11 Best Photo Management Software of (Ultimate Guide).Competitor Comparison | ACDSee
We have the answers. Sigma's been on a roll with their mirrorless Art series lenses. Does the new 24mm F1. It brings a new, 25MP sensor and bit 4K capture at up to p. We've put it to the test, both in the studio and out in the field. In our tests it delivers big performance and offers a few good reasons why you might choose a 12th-Gen Intel laptop over a Mac. Canon's high end APS-C mirrorless camera has plenty of compelling features, but is it worth the price?
Jordan took it on vacation to find out. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level image quality. What's the best camera for shooting landscapes? High resolution, weather-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best.
If you're looking for the perfect drone for yourself, or to gift someone special, we've gone through all of the options and selected our favorites. Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform. In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media.
Reading mode: Light Dark. Login Register. Best cameras and lenses. All forums Retouching Change forum. Started Mar 3, Discussions. Mar 3, I would like to leave Adobe Lightroom behind. Is this a viable replacement? Any input highly appreciated. Reply to thread Reply with quote Complain. Coasting's gear list: Coasting's gear list. Carl Zeiss Touit 1. Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain.
Zuiko Digital 17mm F1. SM I have a lot of experience with both, and they are not comparable in my opinion. One thing that was attractive about ACDSee is that it has a map module. Thank you. SM So many lost souls in here hoping against hope that someone can help them find better software than the Adobe Photo Plan. Reilly Diefenbach's gear list: Reilly Diefenbach's gear list. Reilly Diefenbach wrote: So many lost souls in here hoping against hope that someone can help them find better software than the Adobe Photo Plan.
As a digital asset manager: It's probably the most complete consumer-oriented DAM on the market. Glen Barrington's gear list: Glen Barrington's gear list. SM On1 Raw, which I own, has a map module also. Good luck! Thanks SM. SM I suggest you download the trials and don't take anyone's word for it. Thanks SM That would work just fine. Glen Barrington wrote: As a Raw developer: It doesn't do a lot of automated stuff. Lots of folks here have left Adobe behind very happily.
Haddington's gear list: Haddington's gear list. Zuiko Digital ED mm F4. Zuiko Digital ED mm Zuiko ED mm It's been mentioned here that there are three areas to focus on: 1.
Pixel Editing 2. RAW development 3. DAM I've been using about every main stream product out there, including adopting and abandoning Lightroom. Today I am using; 1. Affinity as my pixel editor. Best value for money. High quality for a very good price. Excellent image quality. Photo Supreme as my DAM. Fastest of the bunch, supporting all metadata standards. If you prefer an all-in-one regardless then I recommend Lightroom. Hans de Zomers's gear list: Hans de Zomers's gear list.
KCook's gear list: KCook's gear list. As DAM its main limitation is that it uses custom XMP tags, you can export them to standard XMP tags but you lose the keyword hierarchy and it's an additional operation As raw developer is quite decent with lots of features but it requires lots of adjustments to get good results, in some cases colors are not as they should be blue skies, red flowers. Gianpaolo's gear list: Gianpaolo's gear list.
F Forum M My threads. PFRE prides itself on the depth and breadth of the information and professional development resources it makes available to our community. Our goal is to help real estate and interior photographers be successful while bringing the community together and elevating the industry as a whole.
Conference News. No items found. Search for:. Author Recent Posts. PFRE Team. Learning Topics. Either way, check out our Video Tutorial Resource Center for tips, tricks and tutorials! Stay informed. We have something for everyone who is interested in digital photography and photo editing. Want to learn more about ACDSee in a live, interactive setting? Sign up for the next workshop! How does it compare? Login to your acdID account to view exclusive upgrade pricing.
Why Upgrade? To activate your software, to validate your subscriptions, or to access online services, you will need a valid email address and an internet connection. Use the links below or press F1 while performing any function in ACDSee to open the relevant online help page. Online Help User Guide. Get free updates and workshops, exclusive offers, photography tips, and much more! Photo Studio Professional Non-destructive Constructive Tools The surgical precision of the Pixel Targeting tool has been added to Develop Mode and includes the familiar color wheel.
Feathering the Creative Edge New for Pro is the paradigm-altering power to fine-tune a selection that was previously impossible. Cloud Drive Access. Location Data.
ACDSee vs Lightroom | Differences and Comparisons of Photo Editors.
There are also some notable tweaks to the user interface and tools on offer. A new refine selection tool helps you outline subjects for editing more accurately, while new text-in-frame and text-on-path tools let you define areas for text overlays and have text follow a curve or shape. And you can now create presets for batch resizing and renaming, and assign these to keyboard shortcuts. Meanwhile, the quick search tool has gained a new button to search only within the previous search results rather than the entire database.
This makes it easier to quickly winnow out unwanted results based on subject matter to find the images you're after. And smaller improvements abound, such as support for GoPro raw files and import of face recognition data from Lightroom and Picasa, easier pairing with ACDSee's Mobile Sync app via QR code, and comprehensive, context-sensitive online help.
Further right, you'll find several icons through which you can sign up for an optional ACDSee subscription, including cloud storage and access to several other apps, view statistics about your photos and the overall database, and view any messages from ACDSee.
Manage mode allows you to browse folders and view their contents on local and network drives without first importing them into the database. There's a choice of several view types, including thumbnails or a film strip beneath a larger preview. You can also view or edit metadata, add tags, ratings or labels, and images or videos can be categorized or added to collections. Additionally, you can view geotagged images on a map or add locations to those that aren't geotagged.
ACDSee Actions — essentially short scripts combining multiple processing steps into a single click -—can be applied, or multiple images loaded into stacks or processed to create an HDR or focus-stacked image. You can also select images to open in Develop or Edit modes or to be handed off to an external application. Rather than giving you access to everything on your drives, Photos mode gives you access by date only to the images and videos you've imported into ACDSee's database, which are shown only as thumbnails.
You have a choice of daily, monthly, or yearly views and can also select folders you'd like to scan for content. There's not much you can do in this mode other than rotating images or selecting an individual image to open in one of the other modes. You can only access relatively small thumbnail views of your content. This mode is similar to the filmstrip view in Manage mode, except most visual clutter is removed or disabled.
It's also the only mode to allow you to actually play videos, rather than seeing them as static thumbnails. To differentiate videos from stills, the other modes show them as groups of four smaller thumbnails taken from various points in the video clip.
There's also an Actions Browser pane for still images that allows you to visually preview the expected results of each action on your selected image before you apply it. Develop mode is where you'll be doing the bulk of your editing. By default — the interface being very customizable — the sliders with which you'll make your adjustments are grouped in a pane at the left of the screen.
Depending upon the size of each panel within the pane, you can mostly have only two open at once, although for a couple of bigger or smaller panes, that number increases or decreases. If you open too many, another panel will simultaneously close to make room for it, preventing you from having to scroll up and down the pane. Most of the basic options are similar to those you'd find in Lightroom, although there are some differences in how they're named or located.
The most notable omissions are equivalents to Lightroom's Whites and Blacks sliders. You'll find a history panel and a categorized selection of developing presets at screen right, but there's no way to preview their results before application. Nor can you access the View mode's Actions Browser in this mode, and if you apply an action before switching to Develop mode, its component steps aren't shown in the history panel.
Finally, we come to Edit mode, which differs from Develop mode in two key ways. Multiple edits can be made to a single image, but if you want to switch to a different image or program mode, you have to render your results at that point. The other key difference is that there's much more hand-holding in this mode, which will help less experienced photographers get the results they're after.
In Develop mode, a few controls do offer automatic modes. Still, there are more auto controls on offer in Edit mode, and some tools also have multiple versions offering different levels of complexity and, of course, varying levels of control as well.
Adobe's images tend to look just a little more processed, with higher levels of sharpening by default and stronger tweaks to local contrast for a slightly punchier result. Differences in sharpening aside, neither app shows any advantage in detail, however. Color is quite similar for the most part, although ACDSee tends to neutralize a golden hour glow more, whereas Lightroom tends to retain a bit more warmth. ACDSee's foliage tends to look a little more realistic, though, and it sometimes holds onto a bit more highlight detail by default.
At higher ISO, there's a much greater difference between the two applications. Adobe Lightroom performs quite a bit of color noise reduction by default, and also removes hot pixels. In the process, though, it sometimes bleaches the natural colors out of your creations. By comparison, ACDSee leaves the color noise very visible along with hot pixels, but it also holds onto what color your camera was able to discern far better than its Adobe rival. And of course, either application provides the tools with which to tame noise manually.
Unfortunately, while those in Lightroom can do a pretty decent job — certainly not in the same league as DxO's DeepPrime , but good enough — ACDSee's noise reduction algorithms are decidedly weak. There's not much that can be done with ACDSee's controls to improve the luminance noise, though. I found the best results at around level 40 on the noise reduction slider.
ACDSee's color noise reduction works reasonably well, although you have to nearly max out the slider to achieve what a light touch on Adobe's slider does. Nor do the noise reduction presets in Develop mode or the noise tool in Edit mode perform any better, as they clearly rely on the same underlying algorithms. Unfortunately, if taming high ISO noise is a frequent concern for you, this alone is probably the biggest reason to give ACDSee a pass for the time being.
As mentioned previously, performance has clearly been a primary goal for the team behind Photo Studio Ultimate I found myself immediately impressed by its performance and decided to really stress it to see how it held up under a difficult load. It contains around 2. And as well as all the stills, there's also a small number of videos, which I also had it catalog.
It took a day or so for Photo Studio Ultimate to finish the job of cataloging all the photos; once it was done adding them to its database and creating a whopping eight gigabytes of thumbnails, performance was excellent.
I should note that this time doesn't include face recognition, something which would likely have added another several days or more. The program still launches in around four or five seconds, and while it takes a rather sluggish 25 seconds to open Photos mode or seconds to first switch to the root folder of the photo library in Manage mode, that's the only time it feels slow.
Once it's done, browsing is instant or very close to it. There's no delay at all as you browse from folder to folder and scroll through thumbnails in Manage mode. Even in Photos mode, which presents every photo in the database as a single, scrollable list of thumbnails grouped by capture date, the thumbnails all appear within a second or less as you scroll through your library. Searching for photos tagged by face recognition as containing a specific individual in that library took just 17 seconds to return almost results.
And adjusting most sliders in develop mode delivered previews that were real-time or very close to it. Note, though, that pixel peeping raws isn't possible with Photo Studio Ultimate at its default settings. To achieve its performance, it relies solely on the embedded previews of raw files, even when they're far too low-res for viewing.
Enabling raw decoding in settings doesn't slow performance that much, and I think ACDSee should really ignore this setting and just always decode raws when viewing Final processing of a set of raw files from the megapixel Pentax K to full-resolution JPEGs at default settings took 12 minutes and 30 seconds, or about 1.
By way of comparison, Adobe Lightroom Classic with similar compression levels and default settings took 9 minutes, 30 seconds, or about 1. ACDSee's face recognition algorithms can detect and identify faces not only when unobscured and looking towards the camera but also in profile view or when partially hidden behind another object. Faces aren't detected when the photo is first imported into the database.
Instead, the algorithms run when manually triggered or, by default, in the background when your computer is left idle in Manage mode. I found the feature to be a big time-saver, but some work is definitely still required to curate detected faces because the algorithms are quite prone to misidentification.
For example, at the default 'moderate' face detection settings, I manually trained the algorithms with pictures of myself, then browsed ACDSee's suggested names list to discover that it thought a cat, a Ferrari logo, my year old son and Formula One race driver Kimi Raikkonen were also me.
And even changing the face detection algorithms to run at their conservative settings didn't solve this issue. After completely clearing all recognition data and starting from scratch, subsequent suggestions still included many non-human and not even remotely face-like objects, including multiple wheel rims, random camera parts, a flower petal, a cupcake, a Korean seafood rice bowl and those ever-present Ferrari logos.
While the algorithms correctly detected a large number of human faces and suggested the correct names for them at least most of the time, I really think ACDSee could use tightening up their suggestions further or offering an even more conservative recognition setting. I also stumbled on several bugs during this review, although in fairness, a couple of these probably only came to light because of how hard I pushed the program while testing its impressive performance.
When cataloging my roughly two-terabyte photo library, everything went fine for around the first 40, photos imported into ACDSee's database.
From that point on, I would get a crash and forced close of the app approximately once every 10, images. Curiously, ACDSee also imported the final 40, images without a crash. I also discovered that after launching the program with my removable media disconnected, then closing, reconnecting the drive, and relaunching, ACDSee incorrectly flagged most of my photos as orphaned. Yet if I double-clicked on the thumbnail of a supposedly orphaned image, it would instantly open without issue, and then its thumbnail would update to show it as unorphaned once more.
There was no rhyme or reason as to which images were incorrectly flagged, either. Instead, the orphans were randomly scattered between those that still showed as accessible in the same folder.
ACDSee's database optimization tool couldn't fix the issue, nor did re-running the Catalog tool, although it did throw up several 'save failed, can't output file' errors. But as I noted, these issues likely relate in part to the size of my photo library, and I didn't see similar behavior with smaller libraries or when using a non-removable drive.
That wasn't true of another face-detection bug I discovered, however. If you rotate an image that already has faces detected in it, the frames for any detected faces are then shown in the wrong area of the image. You can't change the frame positions or shape to fix this, as after switching away from the image and then returning, the frames revert to their previous, incorrect locations. You can delete them, but if you then attempt to manually outline a face instead, the thumbnail shown for that face shows the wrong area of the original, unrotated image rather than the area of the rotated image that you'd selected.
None of these issues are showstoppers, but together they do conspire to make ACDSee feel rather less polished than its Adobe rival. There's a lot to like about ACDSee Photo Studio Ultimate , but there are a couple of concerns that make it a bit harder to recommend. It has great support for a vast range of cameras with decent image quality, and while phones and drones aren't directly supported, their files can be accepted if converted to DNG-format first.
It offers image management features aplenty, and at the lower end of the ISO range, at least, decent image quality. And it does so while providing great performance overall, even with very large photo libraries. But we have concerns about its rather weak noise reduction capabilities, which we'd definitely like to see ACDSee address in a future release. And we also found rather more bugs than we'd like to see, including one that could quite regularly cause a hard crash while cataloging images and videos.
To be clear, we never lost any data. All of our photos and ACDSee's database survived every crash perfectly intact, and the latter can easily be backed up and restored later if you have any concerns. But crashes still make us nervous, especially in software that has already been on the market for close to a year.
If you can live without the more capable noise reduction of some of its rivals and take the time to learn its features, though, ACDSee Photo Studio Ultimate has a huge amount to offer, and its interface is unusually swift and responsive. Coupled with its affordable pricing and optional perpetual licensing, we can still recommend it as an all-in-one tool, albeit with some reservations. Amateur and enthusiast photographers who want an all-in-one tool for managing and editing their photos, and who don't often need sophisticated high ISO noise reduction.
Before buying any software, try getting in touch with customer support. Tech support can be critical to software. They had me reinstall 3 times. They have a 30 day money back guarantee with their software.
How are you out that much money? I have never had any issues with its installation on my PC. Just installed my subscription copy of ACDsee Ultimate , upgraded from version at no extra cost same setup with improvements. Very happy as the subscription is affordable and the upgrades are part of the standard pricing and yes the NR is definatly improved , win - win.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think they ever issued any patches or updates for the version. Buyer beware if you're thinking about getting Can you post a link to a news update on any news website that announced the release of a patch or update from the company? I don't think I am wrong. There are always raw support updates to capture new cameras released during the December holiday season.
It often also corrects any errors and omissions. Don't forget, this small development staff was also busy preparing the Gemstone Beta AND the release at the same time. IIRC, there was no late summer update, which is almost always a camera support release. You are correct! While they might add support for new cameras Sony RAW never fully worked with it, though! The "Check For Updates" button under Help is purely cosmetic.
You said I was wrong and I was not. Please read my post again and kindly point to a patch or update they released for the version other than updated camera support.
Ble59 - you did not qualify your original claim as to the type of update provided. You WERE wrong. You implied that the software was never updated, and appeared to try and insert FUD into the dialog. I am not going to drag this out any longer. I believe I have documented the spurious claim that this software is not updated. The updates provided over the years vary in number, I assume, the actual number depends on the ACDSee product manager's determination of need.
I'm out on this subject. I switched over from Adobe when they moved to a monthly fee. It was a good move, the YouTube coaching is very good, the controls are intuitive for me, the results have been as good or better than Photoshop. DeHaze and light equalizing are both big in my workflow. Presets can be saved. I love it and use it way more than LightRoom and Photoshop for that matter, although Photoshop has features that ACDSee does not have and that are more intuitive and efficient.
The only thing I don't like about this software package, is that it does not Save and Replace an image. You have to keep renaming the image every time you make changes to it. I'm guessing that's a "Nanny" way of keeping you from inadvertently deleting one of your prize images,but it sure is inconvenient!
When saving, there are both "save" and "save as" options. The "save" option opens a conformation box, but it can be switched off by the usual "don't show again" check box. Resources Resources. PFRE prides itself on the depth and breadth of the information and professional development resources it makes available to our community.
Our goal is to help real estate and interior photographers be successful while bringing the community together and elevating the industry as a whole. Conference News. No items found. Search for:. It's such a simplistic idea, but highly effective. In essence, this mode creates a mosaic of thumbnails of all of your images in chronological order.
I often want to dive into my archives and pull out a specific photo, and when you're taking tens of thousands of images every year, that's trickier than it sounds. You either have to remember the date or scroll and wait over and over. With this, however, it very quickly shows you thumbnails just big enough that you can tell exactly what the shot was and locate anything in seconds. This is a real selling point for me and anyone who has large libraries of images.
The view mode is a more thorough section, where you can go through images one by one with the files at a far larger size. This is a typical function for processing software, but it edges the competition by again employing impressive speed with little-to-no buffering in the tests I run. Develop mode is the backbone to all raw, non-destructive editing software. This is where you get to fiddle with all those sliders, agonizing over whether a little more clarity and a little less vibrancy will make all the difference.
In ACDSee Ultimate , you can make all the sweeping changes to your images you could want, as well as the localized alterations using masks. There are also tools for sharpening, noise reduction, and a specialized skin tuning section. It isn't going to be particularly useful for beauty retouching, but for weddings and large batches of images with people or even multiple people, this can be a useful timesaver.
The Edit mode is where the all-in-one solution comes into effect. For me, with Lightroom, I would always import batches of images, fine-tune each image, then export them for Photoshop. With ACDSee Ultimate , you never need to leave the one program and can do nondestructive editing with an impressive complexity. While it might not be Photoshop, it can do an enormous amount and everything many photographers require. There are many familiar functions for those who are used to Photoshop.
You have an array of adjustment layers complete with masks, as well as action sets for completing the more common tasks. One noteworthy feature is Pixel Selector, which is similar to a blend of a few different Photoshop functions you may already be aware of and use.
However, it is significantly easier, more intuitive, and quicker to use, allowing you to alter colors and areas of your image. The interface of any software in this area has a lot to do.
There are enormous quantities of information and organization going on, and so, keeping the program clean and intuitive is no small task. ACDSee does it well by keeping it as simple and as clinical as it can be.
In fact, if I were to be pushed for a criticism of it, that would be it: it looks a touch dated. However, what it might lack in shine, it more than makes up for in customizability.
Anything that speeds up a photographer's workflow is going to be valuable. I have always considered Lightroom to be sluggish even on my PC, which is above and beyond what is needed. One side note on performance — and I must stress this is a layman's observation for the most part — is the resources ACDSee draws upon compared to Lightroom.
Now, I always have Chrome tabs open, as well as a plethora of other programs running and I noticed no slow-down or stress, but for older and lower-end machines, this shift in resource requirements could potentially pose an issue. Watch the latest ACDSee tutorials, read our blog, and more! Go to Top. Sports extensive digital asset management tools for optimal organization and efficiency.
Developed for professional and advanced amateur photographers who need total control of their workflows. New AI-driven People Mode for quick and easy identification of named and unnamed people in your photos. Offers batch file processing, including renaming and resizing multiple files, using Presets. Organize files using a combination of folders, keywords, ratings, color labels, metadata, and categories.
Find files fast — build and store searches based on metadata, file properties, data, event, keyword, rating, location, and edited state.
No comments:
Post a Comment